Risk
Fast AI summaries without traceability
- Conclusions can become detached from source context
- Teams may confuse generated language with reviewed findings
- Research rationale can disappear as work moves forward
Sky Solutions · 30 Apps in 30 Days
I independently designed and directed the AI-assisted development of Sky AI Research (Sky AIR), a qualitative research platform that keeps source evidence, provenance, and researcher review visible throughout analysis. I defined the product strategy, UX architecture, design system, implementation specifications, and quality controls for a completed first MVP that remains under development.
1
Functional MVP completed
5
Evidence workflow stages
Full stack
React, FastAPI, and PostgreSQL
Human-reviewed
Design and implementation handoffs
Project overview
Could AI make research knowledge easier to access without separating conclusions from their evidence? Business analysts and product teams regularly relied on UX researchers for answers, making the UX team an information bottleneck.
Could AI accelerate an end-to-end design and development pipeline without sacrificing consistency, accessibility, or engineering control? I independently defined the product and specifications; Codex generated implementation code under my direction, and I reviewed, tested, and iterated the first MVP.
Part 1 · Designing the product
Sky AIR serves three connected audiences while keeping reviewed evidence—and the UX team’s research standards—at the center of every answer.
Routine questions become easier to answer while UX researchers and designers preserve more time for new research.
Product strategy
The product strategy centered on making AI useful without asking teams to trust opaque outputs. Every finding and answer needed a visible path back to source evidence.
Risk
Direction
Information architecture
I designed connected research objects so transcripts, codes, findings, reports, reusable knowledge, and questions could retain provenance as they moved through the product.
Evidence citations, provenance, ownership, and review status make it possible to inspect how knowledge was created before it is reused.
Core workflow
The five-stage workflow turns raw research into reusable knowledge without hiding the evidence chain or the researcher’s review decisions.
At each handoff, users can inspect evidence, understand status, and correct the material before it becomes organizational knowledge.
Responsible AI
Responsible AI was designed into the workflow and architecture—not added as a disclaimer. The interface shows where content came from, what the AI generated, and what a human has reviewed.
01
02
03
Part 2 · Directing the AI-assisted build
I defined the strategy and specifications, then directed AI-assisted implementation across seven connected stages. I manually reviewed behavior, consistency, accessibility, and test evidence before approving each handoff.
ChatGPT → Figma → Design system → Storybook → React → FastAPI/PostgreSQL → Testing
Human review and approval at every handoff
Validation + outcome
The first MVP is complete and functional. It includes a reusable Figma design system, an AI-assisted Storybook component repository, React front end, FastAPI/PostgreSQL back end, live OpenAI integration, automated front- and back-end tests, Playwright acceptance walkthroughs, and human review controls. Additional vertical slices and formal user evaluation remain underway.
A working full-stack application connects transcript intake through evidence-grounded answers.
Automated tests, Playwright walkthroughs, and human approval support each handoff.
Additional vertical slices and formal target-user evaluation remain underway.
Designing AI responsibly meant treating trust as a workflow—not as a message added after the fact.
Contact
Let’s talk about enterprise modernization, accessible workflows, or responsible AI.
snaggums@gmail.com